Ramprakash ML

I don’t think you were very wrong Gerry.

The quote from SD, 1, 113 in the forgoing synthesizes the threefold designation of the Supreme which is ONE, and THAT “we” are!

To work out the English equivalent of the three, well – we have to think it out. Without Latin and Greek terminologies it may be difficult to rep in only English language. The l…[Read more]

I like the concluding remark :

“ At the same time, the use of analogy and correspondence can lift rational thought out of the merely linear mode of thinking and logic by providing a depth and breadth to our endeavours at understanding.”

So very true. If ONE, not many, or, One in many and many in One is true, then many are the many aspects of tha…[Read more]

Between Tad and Sat there seems to be no difference at all for us so far as we can with our limited perception can comprehend. Both terms seem to address the Absolute Unknowable. Hair-splitting anaysis of the abstraction seems to be an exercise in futility.

But AUM is something comprehensible —intelligible, in Platnoic language, which we can m…[Read more]

“God dwells wherever we let him in”

How do we take it when there is no God ?

HPB somewehre says on the question of God to the effect that it depends on what we mean by that term

If we ascribe anthropomorphic attributive to Reality —things as they are, not as we think or conceive, or things in themselves — then, of course, we fall into a serie…[Read more]

I think Kechara, the sky-walker, is a metaphor, though also literally it is one of the siddhis, going over any part of the globe–not so much in Astral body as in Mayavi-rupa–‘treads the winds above the waves…”

It seems to be the height of “spiritual perfection” in which the Yogi has become All, his mind-soul having become freed from all…[Read more]

What does this information well collated amount to ?

This student feels that Tao is THAT and THIS, both – in fact both are ONE : THAT or Tad in Sanskrit, is Absolute, the Unknown and Unknowable; This, meaning Jagat, manifests universe that periodically arise in it again and again following immutable Cyclic and Karmic LAW

In short, Tao is that…[Read more]

It is the same. Atman is the one True Self, the Self of All. As the Upanishad say of it that there is nothing that is not included in it, there is nothing that is not encompassed by it.

That Thou Art

Hi Barbara

A very important question.

Antahkarana (also pronounced as Antashkarana) literally means Internal organ.

It has one meaning in Vedanta, and quite another in Theosophy.

In Vedanta Antahkarana means mind (chitta), intellect, Buddhi

In Theosophy it means the higher aspect of Lower Manas.

Lower Manas has two aspects : One caught up…[Read more]

As I remember :-

Third Logos is Mahat, the Cosmic Ego. It is the synthesis of primordial seven Rays or Hierarchies.

What is called Ahankara is the “I” principle which emanate from one of the seven Rays of Mahat Tattva.

Such I – principles emanate like millions of sparks, as it were, from the Central Fire, or like millions of Rays of the…[Read more]

so, that explains why our world today is riven with so much heartless competition, conflict, wars, and also underscores the importance of diffusion of Theosophical influence. She says somewhere (probably Key) that brutality and selfishness that rages in mankind at this stage of its evolution is abnormal. Every advancement that is made in science…[Read more]

Sorry, many typos in my previous post. please bear with me.

It is not “antitype” but “Ante-type”

Pavel, you wondered :

What are forms, really, in the Ideal world?

where do all these form come in again, please?

All that can be said is that even the exalted Ones who know the Truth cannot make it intelligible to us. All that they can do is to help our mental consciousness to rise higher to the Archetypes by analogies from things relating to…[Read more]

Pavel Axentiev
June 15, 2017 at 3:48 pm #5838
Ram, could you please explain what is the source of Eternal Verities (on which higher dialectics is based)?

As far as I understand Plato, Eternal Verity, or Truth, is that which is self-existing, which always IS, the Real Being, without generation, subsists by itself. It is apprehended by intelligence…[Read more]

Pavel Axentiev
June 15, 2017 at 3:48 pm #5838
Ram, could you please explain what is the source of Eternal Verities (on which higher dialectics is based)?

As far as I understand Plato, Eternal Verity, or Truth, is that which is self-existing, which always IS, the Real Being, without generation, subsists by itself. It is apprehended by intelligence…[Read more]

Pavel Axentiev
June 18, 2017 at 3:41 am #5851

The query raised is :

“And here again I see the alternate use of the terms spirit and rational soul.
Which begs the question: how much rational is the spirit of man, and what does this actually imply? As for the latter, I suppose, surely, not the equivalence of mere verbal philosophizing with spirit,…[Read more]

Pavel, you will please pardon me for delayed response. Am preoccupied with many other things. I will come back to your post as soon as possible.

Peter
June 16, 2017 at 9:28 am #5842

Hello Peter,
Pardon me for the long delay in responding to your above post. I was preoccupied with other things. I am glad that you got the drift of what I was trying to convey after rereading it.

What you are saying of “discursive” thought, now I understand as ‘Dialectic,” which Taylor explains.…[Read more]

Thanks Peter for the clarification. I see that we both are saying the same thing but differing in the way we are putting across our understanding as regards what you call dionia and Noetic thought. Confusion is caused by the use of the word Discursive by you.

However, I have some misgivings about equating discursive thought or dionia with…[Read more]

Pavel and Peter

As far as I understand Thomas Taylor’s ingenious rendition of Plato’s dialogues, Peter’s rendering of Noetic action as two-fold activity–one on the plane of Ideas, on the one hand, and discursive thought at the level of the mind, on the other–do not seem to me to be correct. (Pardon me, Peter, if I have misunderstood your…[Read more]

That is true, that even the highest minds in the Western intellectual culture have failed to fathom the depth of transcendental wisdom of Plato, except one–whom HPB greatly admires and gives him the full credit for correctly understanding Plato and render his teachings in Greek most faithfully into English. He is the great Platonist, Thomas…[Read more]